Guest

Preview Tool

Cisco Bug: CSCvt14451 - maximum prefix under vrf seems to be a hard limit, not warning only

Last Modified

Feb 26, 2020

Products (1)

  • Cisco ASR 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers

Known Affected Releases

6.5.3.MGBL

Description (partial)

Symptom:
customer saw routes being blocked due to this limit being configured under vrf VRFNAME
maximum prefix maximum [mid-threshold] 

behavior is different when configured under bgp.
bgp 1234
vrf X
maximum prefix xxxx

the configuration under bgp is a warning only, whereas under rib it seems to be  a hard limit, can you help document this?

Conditions:
maximum prefix configured under vrf
Bug details contain sensitive information and therefore require a Cisco.com account to be viewed.

Bug Details Include

  • Full Description (including symptoms, conditions and workarounds)
  • Status
  • Severity
  • Known Fixed Releases
  • Related Community Discussions
  • Number of Related Support Cases
Bug information is viewable for customers and partners who have a service contract. Registered users can view up to 200 bugs per month without a service contract.